<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 903 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211699</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of certain sanitary and bathroom fittings under specific subheadings, aligning with the Commissioner (Appeals) on items like towel rings and robe hooks. However, the classification of the bottle trap was revised to be under subheading 7418.90, impacting duty calculation as per the Central Excise Act. The revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, resulting in a revised duty determination based on the Tribunal&#039;s classification decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 07:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 903 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211699</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of certain sanitary and bathroom fittings under specific subheadings, aligning with the Commissioner (Appeals) on items like towel rings and robe hooks. However, the classification of the bottle trap was revised to be under subheading 7418.90, impacting duty calculation as per the Central Excise Act. The revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, resulting in a revised duty determination based on the Tribunal&#039;s classification decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211699</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>