<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 80 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211689</link>
    <description>A treaty fiction treating a permanent establishment as a distinct enterprise applies only to attribute business profits, and a banking protocol may permit deduction of interest on funds lent to the permanent establishment. On that basis, interest payable by an Indian branch to its foreign head office and overseas branches is deductible in computing branch profits where the treaty so allows. However, the same internal payment is not taxable in India in the hands of the head office unless the treaty or domestic law expressly creates such charge. As the amount was not chargeable to tax in India, no withholding obligation arose and disallowance under the Income-tax Act could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 10:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185106" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 80 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211689</link>
      <description>A treaty fiction treating a permanent establishment as a distinct enterprise applies only to attribute business profits, and a banking protocol may permit deduction of interest on funds lent to the permanent establishment. On that basis, interest payable by an Indian branch to its foreign head office and overseas branches is deductible in computing branch profits where the treaty so allows. However, the same internal payment is not taxable in India in the hands of the head office unless the treaty or domestic law expressly creates such charge. As the amount was not chargeable to tax in India, no withholding obligation arose and disallowance under the Income-tax Act could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>