<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 72 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211681</link>
    <description>The court directed the petitioner to pay Rs.3 lakhs towards tax and interest for the assessment year 2009-2010 within four weeks to the second respondent. Upon payment, the appeal would be promptly disposed of by the first respondent. Recovery of the remaining amount was stayed pending the appeal outcome, and any attachment of the petitioner&#039;s bank account related to the dues was to be lifted upon payment. The Writ Petition was granted with no costs imposed, and connected Miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 20:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185098" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 72 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211681</link>
      <description>The court directed the petitioner to pay Rs.3 lakhs towards tax and interest for the assessment year 2009-2010 within four weeks to the second respondent. Upon payment, the appeal would be promptly disposed of by the first respondent. Recovery of the remaining amount was stayed pending the appeal outcome, and any attachment of the petitioner&#039;s bank account related to the dues was to be lifted upon payment. The Writ Petition was granted with no costs imposed, and connected Miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>