<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 65 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211674</link>
    <description>Notification No. 8/97-CE was held applicable to finished goods manufactured by a 100% export oriented unit from raw material supplied by another 100% EOU and cleared in the domestic tariff area under the EXIM Policy 1997-2002. The Court applied the plain wording of the exemption notification and rejected any reading that would add conditions not expressed in the text. It reiterated that exemption notifications must be construed strictly, but once the eligibility conditions are satisfied, full effect must be given to the exemption. The assessee was therefore entitled to Notification No. 8/97-CE and was not confined to Notification No. 2/95-CE.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2025 12:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185091" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 65 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211674</link>
      <description>Notification No. 8/97-CE was held applicable to finished goods manufactured by a 100% export oriented unit from raw material supplied by another 100% EOU and cleared in the domestic tariff area under the EXIM Policy 1997-2002. The Court applied the plain wording of the exemption notification and rejected any reading that would add conditions not expressed in the text. It reiterated that exemption notifications must be construed strictly, but once the eligibility conditions are satisfied, full effect must be given to the exemption. The assessee was therefore entitled to Notification No. 8/97-CE and was not confined to Notification No. 2/95-CE.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211674</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>