https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211673 The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the excise duty demand on tooling advance written off by the petitioner company. Emphasizing the availability of an alternative remedy, the court directed the petitioner to appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) within a specified timeframe. The judgment highlighted the importance of following due process and exhausting statutory remedies before seeking extraordinary jurisdiction from the court, ensuring a fair adjudication of disputes related to excise law. en-us Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Apr 2012 20:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211673 The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the excise duty demand on tooling advance written off by the petitioner company. Emphasizing the availability of an alternative remedy, the court directed the petitioner to appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) within a specified timeframe. The judgment highlighted the importance of following due process and exhausting statutory remedies before seeking extraordinary jurisdiction from the court, ensuring a fair adjudication of disputes related to excise law. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211673