<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 337 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211645</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the applicant in seeking a waiver of pre-deposit of service tax demand amounting to Rs.6,62,503. The applicant&#039;s services for MHADA were deemed not falling under &#039;Construction Service,&#039; while services for MTDC and BSNL were classified as such due to their association with tourism and telecommunication industries, respectively. The tribunal acknowledged the applicant&#039;s financial hardship, reducing the pre-deposit to Rs.1,00,000 and waiving the remaining amount, interest, and penalties during the appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 15:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185062" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 337 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211645</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the applicant in seeking a waiver of pre-deposit of service tax demand amounting to Rs.6,62,503. The applicant&#039;s services for MHADA were deemed not falling under &#039;Construction Service,&#039; while services for MTDC and BSNL were classified as such due to their association with tourism and telecommunication industries, respectively. The tribunal acknowledged the applicant&#039;s financial hardship, reducing the pre-deposit to Rs.1,00,000 and waiving the remaining amount, interest, and penalties during the appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211645</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>