<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1074 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211644</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reduce the penalty imposed on the assessee from Rs. 1,00,000-00 to Rs. 75,000-00, criticizing the Revenue for challenging a minimal reduction of Rs. 25,000-00 and wasting resources. The Court dismissed the appeal, highlighting the need for the Revenue to adopt a more thoughtful approach in filing appeals to avoid squandering public resources and judicial time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 12:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185061" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1074 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211644</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reduce the penalty imposed on the assessee from Rs. 1,00,000-00 to Rs. 75,000-00, criticizing the Revenue for challenging a minimal reduction of Rs. 25,000-00 and wasting resources. The Court dismissed the appeal, highlighting the need for the Revenue to adopt a more thoughtful approach in filing appeals to avoid squandering public resources and judicial time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211644</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>