<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 332 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211637</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal and upheld the decision to quash the CIT&#039;s order on the warranty claim and Section 35DDA deduction. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of clear findings and adequate inquiry for an order to be deemed erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interest under Section 263.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 11:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 332 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211637</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal and upheld the decision to quash the CIT&#039;s order on the warranty claim and Section 35DDA deduction. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of clear findings and adequate inquiry for an order to be deemed erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interest under Section 263.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211637</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>