<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 329 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211634</link>
    <description>The court quashed the notice under Section 148 and subsequent reassessment proceedings, holding that the income for the assessment year had been validly disclosed and taxed under VDIS, with no escapement of income. The court emphasized the importance of accurate reasons for reopening assessments under Section 148 and upheld the confidentiality provisions of VDIS.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2013 12:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185051" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 329 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211634</link>
      <description>The court quashed the notice under Section 148 and subsequent reassessment proceedings, holding that the income for the assessment year had been validly disclosed and taxed under VDIS, with no escapement of income. The court emphasized the importance of accurate reasons for reopening assessments under Section 148 and upheld the confidentiality provisions of VDIS.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211634</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>