<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 328 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211626</link>
    <description>The appellate authority was directed to hear and decide the appeal on merits once the petitioner makes a pre-deposit of 25% of the duty and penalty within the stipulated time; if the deposit is not made, the appeal will stand dismissed. The writ petition was thus disposed of on the condition attached to the statutory appellate remedy, making compliance with the pre-deposit requirement determinative of whether the appeal proceeds to merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 328 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211626</link>
      <description>The appellate authority was directed to hear and decide the appeal on merits once the petitioner makes a pre-deposit of 25% of the duty and penalty within the stipulated time; if the deposit is not made, the appeal will stand dismissed. The writ petition was thus disposed of on the condition attached to the statutory appellate remedy, making compliance with the pre-deposit requirement determinative of whether the appeal proceeds to merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>