<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 890 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211620</link>
    <description>The Tribunal referred the matter to the High Court for contempt proceedings against the appellants for seeking adjournments on false grounds despite their advocate&#039;s withdrawal, deeming it interference in the administration of justice. The decision underscores the significance of honesty and transparency in legal proceedings, warning against deceitful practices and emphasizing the importance of acting in good faith to uphold the integrity of the judicial process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 15:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185037" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 890 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211620</link>
      <description>The Tribunal referred the matter to the High Court for contempt proceedings against the appellants for seeking adjournments on false grounds despite their advocate&#039;s withdrawal, deeming it interference in the administration of justice. The decision underscores the significance of honesty and transparency in legal proceedings, warning against deceitful practices and emphasizing the importance of acting in good faith to uphold the integrity of the judicial process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211620</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>