<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 887 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211611</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the Appeal based on the timing of the legal provisions, without delving into the other issues raised by the Appellant. The decision highlighted the significance of the legislative timeline in determining the tax liability of services received from abroad, providing consequential reliefs to the Appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 14:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185028" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 887 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211611</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the Appeal based on the timing of the legal provisions, without delving into the other issues raised by the Appellant. The decision highlighted the significance of the legislative timeline in determining the tax liability of services received from abroad, providing consequential reliefs to the Appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211611</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>