<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 323 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211605</link>
    <description>The judgment ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the appeal and emphasizing that the Commissioner of Income Tax was not justified in invoking revisionary power under Section 263 concerning dividend stripping and the payment made to the director. The Tribunal&#039;s factual findings were upheld, and the question of law was answered in favor of the assessee against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 323 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211605</link>
      <description>The judgment ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the appeal and emphasizing that the Commissioner of Income Tax was not justified in invoking revisionary power under Section 263 concerning dividend stripping and the payment made to the director. The Tribunal&#039;s factual findings were upheld, and the question of law was answered in favor of the assessee against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>