<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 322 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211604</link>
    <description>Clerical and typographical errors apparent from the record in an earlier AAR ruling could be corrected under Rule 19 of the AAR (Procedure) Rules, 1996. The rectification covered an incorrect monetary reference and a date entry, both treated as mistakes apparent on the face of the record. The mistakes were rectified and a corrected order was directed to be issued in favour of the applicant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 10:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 322 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211604</link>
      <description>Clerical and typographical errors apparent from the record in an earlier AAR ruling could be corrected under Rule 19 of the AAR (Procedure) Rules, 1996. The rectification covered an incorrect monetary reference and a date entry, both treated as mistakes apparent on the face of the record. The mistakes were rectified and a corrected order was directed to be issued in favour of the applicant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211604</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>