<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1231 - Delhi High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211595</link>
    <description>The Court granted the petitioner liberty to file objections within a week in accordance with section 144C(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Dispute Resolution Panel was directed to follow the procedures outlined in subsections (5) to (7) of section 144C, including providing a personal hearing and issuing a speaking order with cogent reasons. The Court emphasized the importance of the Dispute Resolution Panel acting in accordance with the law to ensure a fair process and clarified that approaching the Panel was not a perfunctory measure. The writ petition was disposed of with mentioned directions, and no costs were awarded to either party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 12:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185012" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1231 - Delhi High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211595</link>
      <description>The Court granted the petitioner liberty to file objections within a week in accordance with section 144C(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Dispute Resolution Panel was directed to follow the procedures outlined in subsections (5) to (7) of section 144C, including providing a personal hearing and issuing a speaking order with cogent reasons. The Court emphasized the importance of the Dispute Resolution Panel acting in accordance with the law to ensure a fair process and clarified that approaching the Panel was not a perfunctory measure. The writ petition was disposed of with mentioned directions, and no costs were awarded to either party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>