<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 309 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211588</link>
    <description>The winding up petition filed by the petitioner against the respondent-company, citing a debt dispute of Rs. 17,26,952, was dismissed by the High Court. The court emphasized the need for a clear admission for a winding up petition to be allowed and directed the case to be resolved in a civil court due to disputed factual questions. The judgment highlighted the importance of a bona fide dispute and the comprehensive legal process in resolving complex financial disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=185005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 309 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211588</link>
      <description>The winding up petition filed by the petitioner against the respondent-company, citing a debt dispute of Rs. 17,26,952, was dismissed by the High Court. The court emphasized the need for a clear admission for a winding up petition to be allowed and directed the case to be resolved in a civil court due to disputed factual questions. The judgment highlighted the importance of a bona fide dispute and the comprehensive legal process in resolving complex financial disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211588</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>