<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1064 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211581</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by staying the recovery of interest on the duty demanded, recognizing the impact of delayed single registration on duty payment. The penalty imposed under Section 11AC was set aside, with the focus primarily on the interest payment under Section 11AB. The decision highlighted the need to consider unique circumstances in excise duty cases when determining interest and penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 15:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184998" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1064 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211581</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by staying the recovery of interest on the duty demanded, recognizing the impact of delayed single registration on duty payment. The penalty imposed under Section 11AC was set aside, with the focus primarily on the interest payment under Section 11AB. The decision highlighted the need to consider unique circumstances in excise duty cases when determining interest and penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211581</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>