<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 338 - Bombay High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211572</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the Revenue could not contest deductions under sections 80-IB and 10BA for outsourcing craft and artistic items, as well as the treatment of DEPB for computing deduction under section 10BA. The court held that the Revenue&#039;s challenges were not valid due to its acceptance of previous Tribunal decisions on manufacturing activities and worker count, leading to the dismissal of the issues raised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184989" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 338 - Bombay High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211572</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the Revenue could not contest deductions under sections 80-IB and 10BA for outsourcing craft and artistic items, as well as the treatment of DEPB for computing deduction under section 10BA. The court held that the Revenue&#039;s challenges were not valid due to its acceptance of previous Tribunal decisions on manufacturing activities and worker count, leading to the dismissal of the issues raised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211572</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>