<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 335 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211569</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee primarily focusing on the allowability of conveyance allowance, additional conveyance allowance, and incentive bonus. The Tribunal found that these payments were reimbursements for expenses incurred in the performance of duties, qualifying for exemption under section 10(14) of the I.T. Act. Other grounds raised by the appellant were not effectively pressed, and the Tribunal had previously upheld the reopening of assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 335 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211569</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee primarily focusing on the allowability of conveyance allowance, additional conveyance allowance, and incentive bonus. The Tribunal found that these payments were reimbursements for expenses incurred in the performance of duties, qualifying for exemption under section 10(14) of the I.T. Act. Other grounds raised by the appellant were not effectively pressed, and the Tribunal had previously upheld the reopening of assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>