<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1168 - Gujarat High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211559</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision on both issues, disallowing entertainment expenses and balances without confirmation/details. The Tribunal found the expenses genuine and allowable under section 37 of the Income Tax Act, limiting the disallowance to 1/3 of the total. Regarding balances, the Tribunal agreed with the Commissioner (Appeals) that the assessee had proven the identities of parties and provided necessary documents, dismissing the Assessing Officer&#039;s additions based on suspicion. The Court found no legal infirmity in the Tribunal&#039;s order, dismissing the appeal for lack of substantial legal questions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 12:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1168 - Gujarat High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211559</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision on both issues, disallowing entertainment expenses and balances without confirmation/details. The Tribunal found the expenses genuine and allowable under section 37 of the Income Tax Act, limiting the disallowance to 1/3 of the total. Regarding balances, the Tribunal agreed with the Commissioner (Appeals) that the assessee had proven the identities of parties and provided necessary documents, dismissing the Assessing Officer&#039;s additions based on suspicion. The Court found no legal infirmity in the Tribunal&#039;s order, dismissing the appeal for lack of substantial legal questions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>