<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 912 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211557</link>
    <description>The tribunal held that the appellant must pay duty on the depreciated value of the imported machinery, including Basic Customs Duty (BCD), additional duty, and special duty of Customs under notification No.53/97-Cus. The appeal challenging the order-in-appeal regarding clearance of the machinery in DTA was dismissed, directing the appellant to pay the balance duty amount after adjusting the previously paid sum, emphasizing the comprehensive duty liability encompassing various customs duties specified in the notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2013 16:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 912 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211557</link>
      <description>The tribunal held that the appellant must pay duty on the depreciated value of the imported machinery, including Basic Customs Duty (BCD), additional duty, and special duty of Customs under notification No.53/97-Cus. The appeal challenging the order-in-appeal regarding clearance of the machinery in DTA was dismissed, directing the appellant to pay the balance duty amount after adjusting the previously paid sum, emphasizing the comprehensive duty liability encompassing various customs duties specified in the notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211557</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>