<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 911 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211543</link>
    <description>For the period before Section 66A of the Finance Act, 1994 came into force on 18-4-2006, a service recipient in India was not prima facie liable to pay service tax on services received from a foreign provider without an office in India. In that setting, the Tribunal held that the assessee had made out a strong prima facie case and was entitled to unconditional stay of the pre-deposit of service tax and equal penalty. The contrary reliance on an interim stay order was distinguished, while the earlier Larger Bench view supporting the assessee was noted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184960" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 911 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211543</link>
      <description>For the period before Section 66A of the Finance Act, 1994 came into force on 18-4-2006, a service recipient in India was not prima facie liable to pay service tax on services received from a foreign provider without an office in India. In that setting, the Tribunal held that the assessee had made out a strong prima facie case and was entitled to unconditional stay of the pre-deposit of service tax and equal penalty. The contrary reliance on an interim stay order was distinguished, while the earlier Larger Bench view supporting the assessee was noted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211543</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>