<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1409 - Bombay High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211539</link>
    <description>Retracted statements recorded under Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962, taken during illegal detention and promptly retracted, were held unreliable in the absence of proof of voluntariness and independent corroboration, so they could not by themselves sustain a conspiracy charge. The search and seizure evidence also failed to establish recovery beyond doubt because the independent panch witness was found unreliable on material aspects and the departmental evidence, with contradictions and gaps, did not satisfactorily connect the tempo or the accused to the alleged contraband. The acquittal was therefore affirmed for failure to prove either conspiracy or recovery with reliable evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 22:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1409 - Bombay High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211539</link>
      <description>Retracted statements recorded under Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962, taken during illegal detention and promptly retracted, were held unreliable in the absence of proof of voluntariness and independent corroboration, so they could not by themselves sustain a conspiracy charge. The search and seizure evidence also failed to establish recovery beyond doubt because the independent panch witness was found unreliable on material aspects and the departmental evidence, with contradictions and gaps, did not satisfactorily connect the tempo or the accused to the alleged contraband. The acquittal was therefore affirmed for failure to prove either conspiracy or recovery with reliable evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211539</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>