<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 288 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211535</link>
    <description>The court granted relief to the petitioner by staying the recovery of the balance demand for Assessment Years 2008-09 and 2009-10, vacating earlier directions, and instructing prompt action on pending appeals. The judgment emphasized the importance of reasoned orders for stay applications and the need for authorities to follow legal precedents in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 11:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184952" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 288 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211535</link>
      <description>The court granted relief to the petitioner by staying the recovery of the balance demand for Assessment Years 2008-09 and 2009-10, vacating earlier directions, and instructing prompt action on pending appeals. The judgment emphasized the importance of reasoned orders for stay applications and the need for authorities to follow legal precedents in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211535</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>