<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1159 - Karnataka High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211525</link>
    <description>The High Court held that compensation received for giving up the right to specific performance of a property sale agreement constitutes a transfer of a capital asset, attracting capital gains tax. The Court overturned the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing that the right to specific performance is a capital asset, and its relinquishment is taxable. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were allowed, the Tribunal&#039;s orders were set aside, and the matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer for computing capital gains in compliance with the law and the Court&#039;s directives, including deductions under Section 48 of the Income Tax Act. Each party was to bear its own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 22:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184942" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1159 - Karnataka High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211525</link>
      <description>The High Court held that compensation received for giving up the right to specific performance of a property sale agreement constitutes a transfer of a capital asset, attracting capital gains tax. The Court overturned the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing that the right to specific performance is a capital asset, and its relinquishment is taxable. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were allowed, the Tribunal&#039;s orders were set aside, and the matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer for computing capital gains in compliance with the law and the Court&#039;s directives, including deductions under Section 48 of the Income Tax Act. Each party was to bear its own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>