https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211516 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand imposed on zinc ash and dross resulting from the galvanization process. Relying on legal precedents and the definition of excisable goods applicable during the relevant period, the Tribunal concluded that zinc ash and dross are not excisable products. Therefore, the demand under Rule 6(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules was deemed unjustified, leading to the appellants receiving consequential relief. en-us Tue, 26 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 25 Mar 2012 22:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211516 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand imposed on zinc ash and dross resulting from the galvanization process. Relying on legal precedents and the definition of excisable goods applicable during the relevant period, the Tribunal concluded that zinc ash and dross are not excisable products. Therefore, the demand under Rule 6(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules was deemed unjustified, leading to the appellants receiving consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 26 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211516