<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 283 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211508</link>
    <description>The court ruled in three appeals by a cooperative society providing banking services, determining the taxability of their services under &quot;Banking and Other Financial Services&quot; as per the Finance Act, 1994. The interpretation of &quot;body corporate&quot; and &quot;any other person&quot; for tax liability was crucial. Applying the rule of ejusdem generis, the court analyzed if a cooperative society falls under these terms. It considered a CBEC Circular on service classification, distinguishing the cooperative society&#039;s services from a post office. Penalties under sections 76 and 78 were discussed, with the court upholding the penalty under section 76 but setting aside the penalty under section 78.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2014 14:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184925" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 283 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211508</link>
      <description>The court ruled in three appeals by a cooperative society providing banking services, determining the taxability of their services under &quot;Banking and Other Financial Services&quot; as per the Finance Act, 1994. The interpretation of &quot;body corporate&quot; and &quot;any other person&quot; for tax liability was crucial. Applying the rule of ejusdem generis, the court analyzed if a cooperative society falls under these terms. It considered a CBEC Circular on service classification, distinguishing the cooperative society&#039;s services from a post office. Penalties under sections 76 and 78 were discussed, with the court upholding the penalty under section 76 but setting aside the penalty under section 78.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>