<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 315 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211492</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision and previous judgment, dismissing the appeals. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the set off of unabsorbed depreciation against business income. It held that the set off should be granted before the exemption under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act, following the precedent that profits under Section 10A should be excluded from the total income, thus disallowing the set off of losses against such profits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 19:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184909" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 315 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211492</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision and previous judgment, dismissing the appeals. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the set off of unabsorbed depreciation against business income. It held that the set off should be granted before the exemption under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act, following the precedent that profits under Section 10A should be excluded from the total income, thus disallowing the set off of losses against such profits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211492</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>