<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 272 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211487</link>
    <description>Customs duty exemption for imported urea is discussed as turning on the exemption notification itself, not on a separate import licence condition, where the notification contains no express actual-user requirement and the words &quot;for use as manure&quot; indicate intended use only. Any alleged diversion for industrial use is treated as a matter for action under the appropriate law, not as a basis to deny customs exemption. The commentary also notes that breach of the licence condition may still attract penalty, but the penalty was viewed as excessive and only a limited pre-deposit towards penalty was directed, with the balance stayed pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Nov 2013 14:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184904" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 272 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211487</link>
      <description>Customs duty exemption for imported urea is discussed as turning on the exemption notification itself, not on a separate import licence condition, where the notification contains no express actual-user requirement and the words &quot;for use as manure&quot; indicate intended use only. Any alleged diversion for industrial use is treated as a matter for action under the appropriate law, not as a basis to deny customs exemption. The commentary also notes that breach of the licence condition may still attract penalty, but the penalty was viewed as excessive and only a limited pre-deposit towards penalty was directed, with the balance stayed pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211487</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>