<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 271 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211474</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the services provided by the Appellant were primarily transportation of goods and not classified as cargo handling service. The demand for service tax under &quot;cargo handling service&quot; was set aside, and the appeal was granted with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 271 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211474</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the services provided by the Appellant were primarily transportation of goods and not classified as cargo handling service. The demand for service tax under &quot;cargo handling service&quot; was set aside, and the appeal was granted with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211474</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>