<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 259 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211461</link>
    <description>Identical receipts from hotel-related marketing, reservation, advertising and loyalty programme services were treated as business income, not royalty or fees for technical services, because earlier decisions in the assessee&#039;s own case had already reached that conclusion and the jurisdictional High Court had rejected the Revenue&#039;s challenge. With no permanent establishment in India, Article 7 of the India-USA DTAA barred taxation of those business profits in India. The characterisation under section 9(1)(vi) and section 9(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act did not change that result, so the additions were deleted and the Revenue&#039;s appeals failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 12:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184879" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 259 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211461</link>
      <description>Identical receipts from hotel-related marketing, reservation, advertising and loyalty programme services were treated as business income, not royalty or fees for technical services, because earlier decisions in the assessee&#039;s own case had already reached that conclusion and the jurisdictional High Court had rejected the Revenue&#039;s challenge. With no permanent establishment in India, Article 7 of the India-USA DTAA barred taxation of those business profits in India. The characterisation under section 9(1)(vi) and section 9(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act did not change that result, so the additions were deleted and the Revenue&#039;s appeals failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211461</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>