<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 255 - Madras High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211457</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court remitted the matter back to the Assessing Officer for reevaluation regarding a company&#039;s bad debt claim against the Madhya Pradesh State Transport Corporation. The Court emphasized the need for a rehearing based on the appellant&#039;s valid write-off of the debt, as clarified in a previous Supreme Court judgment. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was set aside, directing both parties to present their case within three months for expedited resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 13:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184875" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 255 - Madras High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211457</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court remitted the matter back to the Assessing Officer for reevaluation regarding a company&#039;s bad debt claim against the Madhya Pradesh State Transport Corporation. The Court emphasized the need for a rehearing based on the appellant&#039;s valid write-off of the debt, as clarified in a previous Supreme Court judgment. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was set aside, directing both parties to present their case within three months for expedited resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>