<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 853 - Gujarat High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211453</link>
    <description>Rule 57-CC of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 applied where inputs were used in relation to both duty-paid and exempt final products, and the assessee was therefore required to reverse 8% of the price. Goods supplied to a buyer availing exemption under Notification No. 6/2000 remained within the exemption framework, and compliance with Chapter X procedure under the notification was only a condition for availing that exemption. That procedural safeguard did not convert the transaction into Chapter X remission so as to exclude it from Rule 57-CC. The assessee was liable to reverse credit and was not entitled to refund of the modvat credit reversed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 12:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 853 - Gujarat High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211453</link>
      <description>Rule 57-CC of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 applied where inputs were used in relation to both duty-paid and exempt final products, and the assessee was therefore required to reverse 8% of the price. Goods supplied to a buyer availing exemption under Notification No. 6/2000 remained within the exemption framework, and compliance with Chapter X procedure under the notification was only a condition for availing that exemption. That procedural safeguard did not convert the transaction into Chapter X remission so as to exclude it from Rule 57-CC. The assessee was liable to reverse credit and was not entitled to refund of the modvat credit reversed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>