<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 248 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211449</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee and allowing the refund claim for excise duty paid under protest. The court emphasized the importance of verifying evidence to determine if the duty had been passed on to customers. The judgment highlighted that the burden of proof lies with the assessee to show non-passing on of duty, ultimately dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2014 11:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 248 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211449</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee and allowing the refund claim for excise duty paid under protest. The court emphasized the importance of verifying evidence to determine if the duty had been passed on to customers. The judgment highlighted that the burden of proof lies with the assessee to show non-passing on of duty, ultimately dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>