https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211433 Where recovery proceedings involve a disputed title to attached property, the Debts Recovery Tribunal may determine ownership as an incidental part of its recovery powers, while the Recovery Officer has no separate jurisdiction to decide that dispute. The commentary also notes that, where the title question goes to the basis of attachment, recovery may be kept in suspense pending adjudication of ownership, after hearing the affected parties and the official liquidator, with principles akin to resistance to execution under Order 21 Rules 97 to 100 CPC guiding the process. en-us Thu, 20 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Feb 2013 11:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211433 Where recovery proceedings involve a disputed title to attached property, the Debts Recovery Tribunal may determine ownership as an incidental part of its recovery powers, while the Recovery Officer has no separate jurisdiction to decide that dispute. The commentary also notes that, where the title question goes to the basis of attachment, recovery may be kept in suspense pending adjudication of ownership, after hearing the affected parties and the official liquidator, with principles akin to resistance to execution under Order 21 Rules 97 to 100 CPC guiding the process. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 20 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211433