<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 877 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211426</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the applicants were liable to pay service tax on write-backs and discounts received from media under &#039;Business Auxiliary Service&#039;. However, it was determined that service tax on coordination costs paid to overseas entities before 18-4-2006 was not payable. The Tribunal directed the applicants to make a pre-deposit of Rs. 85,00,000 within eight weeks, with the balance amount of service tax, interest, and penalties stayed during the appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 19:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184844" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 877 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211426</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the applicants were liable to pay service tax on write-backs and discounts received from media under &#039;Business Auxiliary Service&#039;. However, it was determined that service tax on coordination costs paid to overseas entities before 18-4-2006 was not payable. The Tribunal directed the applicants to make a pre-deposit of Rs. 85,00,000 within eight weeks, with the balance amount of service tax, interest, and penalties stayed during the appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>