https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211418 The appeal was allowed, setting aside the order dated 6th October 2010. The Company Law Board was directed to issue an appropriate order in Company Petition No. 129/2007 in line with the consent order from 16.7.2009. The court suggested addressing objections to the valuation report within the confines of the consent order, either by referring them back to the valuer or appointing a new one. It emphasized that the consent order was binding and should not be subject to review or annulment. en-us Mon, 05 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Mar 2012 18:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211418 The appeal was allowed, setting aside the order dated 6th October 2010. The Company Law Board was directed to issue an appropriate order in Company Petition No. 129/2007 in line with the consent order from 16.7.2009. The court suggested addressing objections to the valuation report within the confines of the consent order, either by referring them back to the valuer or appointing a new one. It emphasized that the consent order was binding and should not be subject to review or annulment. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 05 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211418