<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 871 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211410</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant for delayed payment of service tax, as the tax and interest were paid before the show cause notice without any fraudulent intent. The Tribunal relied on Section 73(3) of the Finance Act, 1994, and a precedent to conclude that the penalty was unjustified. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, providing relief to the appellant in this matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184828" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 871 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211410</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant for delayed payment of service tax, as the tax and interest were paid before the show cause notice without any fraudulent intent. The Tribunal relied on Section 73(3) of the Finance Act, 1994, and a precedent to conclude that the penalty was unjustified. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, providing relief to the appellant in this matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211410</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>