<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 844 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211393</link>
    <description>In proceedings concerning alleged unaccounted monies held abroad, the Court considered that slow, fragmented, multi-agency investigation justified court-monitored supervision and directed constitution of a Special Investigation Team under former judges with reporting obligations. On disclosure of German-sourced information about Liechtenstein bank accounts, the treaty was not treated as imposing an absolute bar, but privacy concerns required limits while investigations remained pending. Disclosure was therefore confined to cases where proceedings had concluded or show-cause notices had been issued, and names linked only to pending investigations were withheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2013 14:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184813" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 844 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211393</link>
      <description>In proceedings concerning alleged unaccounted monies held abroad, the Court considered that slow, fragmented, multi-agency investigation justified court-monitored supervision and directed constitution of a Special Investigation Team under former judges with reporting obligations. On disclosure of German-sourced information about Liechtenstein bank accounts, the treaty was not treated as imposing an absolute bar, but privacy concerns required limits while investigations remained pending. Disclosure was therefore confined to cases where proceedings had concluded or show-cause notices had been issued, and names linked only to pending investigations were withheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211393</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>