https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211381 Limitation for offences involving false statements in a prospectus was treated as running from the complainant's knowledge of the alleged falsity, not merely from the date of issue of the prospectus. A challenge to quashing under inherent jurisdiction was rejected where the complaint disclosed a prima facie case and the accused's objections on resignation from directorship, inquiry material, and change of address turned on factual matters for trial. The summoning order was not shown to be mechanical or illegal, so interference was declined and the prosecution was left to proceed in accordance with law. en-us Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Feb 2013 17:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211381 Limitation for offences involving false statements in a prospectus was treated as running from the complainant's knowledge of the alleged falsity, not merely from the date of issue of the prospectus. A challenge to quashing under inherent jurisdiction was rejected where the complaint disclosed a prima facie case and the accused's objections on resignation from directorship, inquiry material, and change of address turned on factual matters for trial. The summoning order was not shown to be mechanical or illegal, so interference was declined and the prosecution was left to proceed in accordance with law. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211381