<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 188 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211359</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming that the proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer were barred by limitation. It upheld the interpretation that a four-year limitation period applied, based on Delhi High Court decisions, and that the proviso to Section 201(3) did not extend this period for cases not pending as of 1st April 2007. Consequently, the Assessing Officer&#039;s orders under Section 201(1)/201(1A) were invalidated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184779" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 188 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211359</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming that the proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer were barred by limitation. It upheld the interpretation that a four-year limitation period applied, based on Delhi High Court decisions, and that the proviso to Section 201(3) did not extend this period for cases not pending as of 1st April 2007. Consequently, the Assessing Officer&#039;s orders under Section 201(1)/201(1A) were invalidated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211359</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>