<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 182 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211340</link>
    <description>The Tribunal reversed the CENVAT Credit for exempted goods, applying a retrospective amendment from Budget 2008. Emphasizing the need for a detailed examination by the adjudicating authority, the Tribunal clarified the procedure for claiming the reversal of proportionate CENVAT Credit under Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Due to the inadequacies in considering debits and arguments, the Tribunal remanded the matter for fresh consideration, directing cooperation with the adjudicating authority. Upholding principles of natural justice, the Tribunal aimed for a fair and thorough review of the issues involved, ensuring procedural fairness in the adjudication process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 182 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211340</link>
      <description>The Tribunal reversed the CENVAT Credit for exempted goods, applying a retrospective amendment from Budget 2008. Emphasizing the need for a detailed examination by the adjudicating authority, the Tribunal clarified the procedure for claiming the reversal of proportionate CENVAT Credit under Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Due to the inadequacies in considering debits and arguments, the Tribunal remanded the matter for fresh consideration, directing cooperation with the adjudicating authority. Upholding principles of natural justice, the Tribunal aimed for a fair and thorough review of the issues involved, ensuring procedural fairness in the adjudication process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211340</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>