<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 432 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211339</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that distributor&#039;s commission and freight charges are includible in the assessable value, while canister rentals are not. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for re-quantification of duty demands and penalties based on this ruling. In the case of the show cause notice dated 8-10-2002, the duty demand was limited to the normal limitation period. The penalties were to be adjusted accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 432 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211339</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that distributor&#039;s commission and freight charges are includible in the assessable value, while canister rentals are not. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for re-quantification of duty demands and penalties based on this ruling. In the case of the show cause notice dated 8-10-2002, the duty demand was limited to the normal limitation period. The penalties were to be adjusted accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>