<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 841 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211338</link>
    <description>Freight and insurance charges were held not to form part of the assessable value for central excise duty, because the Supreme Court principle applied in the text treats transportation and insurance costs as outside the value of the goods supplied. On that basis, such charges were not includible in assessable value, and the Revenue&#039;s appeals failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 13:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 841 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211338</link>
      <description>Freight and insurance charges were held not to form part of the assessable value for central excise duty, because the Supreme Court principle applied in the text treats transportation and insurance costs as outside the value of the goods supplied. On that basis, such charges were not includible in assessable value, and the Revenue&#039;s appeals failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>