https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211334 A bidder who quoted Central sales tax at 2% in the tender could not, after evaluation and acceptance of the financial bid on that basis, resile from its own quotation and seek reimbursement at 4% merely by alleging mistake. The Court treated the contractual record and comparative statement as showing that the tender was assessed on the rates actually quoted, and it declined to grant writ relief on that factual basis. It also noted that writ jurisdiction is not barred in contractual matters in principle, but interference is inappropriate where the dispute depends on facts evident from the record; the respondents' failure to file an application under section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 did not alter that result. en-us Mon, 08 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Sep 2014 16:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211334 A bidder who quoted Central sales tax at 2% in the tender could not, after evaluation and acceptance of the financial bid on that basis, resile from its own quotation and seek reimbursement at 4% merely by alleging mistake. The Court treated the contractual record and comparative statement as showing that the tender was assessed on the rates actually quoted, and it declined to grant writ relief on that factual basis. It also noted that writ jurisdiction is not barred in contractual matters in principle, but interference is inappropriate where the dispute depends on facts evident from the record; the respondents' failure to file an application under section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 did not alter that result. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 08 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211334