https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211331 The High Court upheld the removal order of a sub-ordinate Judge, issued without an inquiry, under Article 311(2)(b) of the Constitution. The Court found that the Judge did not prepare judgments independently, justifying the removal without an inquiry. The decision highlighted the balance between the pleasure doctrine and due process, affirming the High Court's authority in disciplinary actions. The Governor's invocation of Article 311(2)(b) was deemed appropriate, and the appeal challenging the removal was dismissed, with each party bearing their costs. en-us Sat, 10 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Mar 2012 18:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211331 The High Court upheld the removal order of a sub-ordinate Judge, issued without an inquiry, under Article 311(2)(b) of the Constitution. The Court found that the Judge did not prepare judgments independently, justifying the removal without an inquiry. The decision highlighted the balance between the pleasure doctrine and due process, affirming the High Court's authority in disciplinary actions. The Governor's invocation of Article 311(2)(b) was deemed appropriate, and the appeal challenging the removal was dismissed, with each party bearing their costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 10 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211331