<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 176 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211330</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, determining that the full value of consideration for the power transmission business (PTB) was Rs. 143 crore, with the negative net worth of Rs. 157 crore to be added, resulting in a capital gain of Rs. 300 crore. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to statutory provisions for accurate computation of capital gains in slump sales, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to ignore the negative net worth.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 10:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 176 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211330</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, determining that the full value of consideration for the power transmission business (PTB) was Rs. 143 crore, with the negative net worth of Rs. 157 crore to be added, resulting in a capital gain of Rs. 300 crore. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to statutory provisions for accurate computation of capital gains in slump sales, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to ignore the negative net worth.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211330</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>