https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211326 Seized imported goods under Section 124 of the Customs Act were the subject of proceedings following allegations of undervaluation, and provisional release had been granted on conditions said to be onerous. The grievance was that delay in completing the proceedings was causing demurrage and that the direction to conclude them within a fixed time should be interfered with. The High Court found that expeditious completion of the confiscation-related proceedings would serve the ends of justice and saw no reason to disturb the direction already issued by the Single Judge. The appeal was therefore dismissed and the order left undisturbed. en-us Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211326 Seized imported goods under Section 124 of the Customs Act were the subject of proceedings following allegations of undervaluation, and provisional release had been granted on conditions said to be onerous. The grievance was that delay in completing the proceedings was causing demurrage and that the direction to conclude them within a fixed time should be interfered with. The High Court found that expeditious completion of the confiscation-related proceedings would serve the ends of justice and saw no reason to disturb the direction already issued by the Single Judge. The appeal was therefore dismissed and the order left undisturbed. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211326