https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211315 Methamphetamine was treated as a psychotropic substance under the NDPS Act, so possession, transport and transhipment of commercial quantity remained punishable under Section 22 despite its omission from Schedule I of the NDPS Rules; the rules could not override the Act, and no lawful authorisation was shown. General import-export and drug licences under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act or the NDPS Rules did not authorise dealings in Methamphetamine, because they were only general in nature and did not bring the accused within any statutory exception. Bail orders were set aside because the recovery and surrounding material disclosed a prima facie NDPS offence and the legal basis for bail was erroneous. en-us Thu, 17 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211315 Methamphetamine was treated as a psychotropic substance under the NDPS Act, so possession, transport and transhipment of commercial quantity remained punishable under Section 22 despite its omission from Schedule I of the NDPS Rules; the rules could not override the Act, and no lawful authorisation was shown. General import-export and drug licences under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act or the NDPS Rules did not authorise dealings in Methamphetamine, because they were only general in nature and did not bring the accused within any statutory exception. Bail orders were set aside because the recovery and surrounding material disclosed a prima facie NDPS offence and the legal basis for bail was erroneous. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 17 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211315