<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 162 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211299</link>
    <description>Re-imported food goods that fail prescribed health and safety standards cannot be released into the domestic market for consumption. Here, goods earlier exported and later returned by the foreign purchaser were tested on re-import and found non-compliant with the Prevention of Food Adulteration regime. The court held that clearance would expose the public to unsafe food, so release was refused and the request for mandamus and re-examination was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 10:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 162 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211299</link>
      <description>Re-imported food goods that fail prescribed health and safety standards cannot be released into the domestic market for consumption. Here, goods earlier exported and later returned by the foreign purchaser were tested on re-import and found non-compliant with the Prevention of Food Adulteration regime. The court held that clearance would expose the public to unsafe food, so release was refused and the request for mandamus and re-examination was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211299</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>